Which statement best explains why an agency might require a warning before deploying OC spray?

• A. To document in the officer's report
• B. To support de-escalation efforts and give the subject a chance to comply, when safe and feasible
• C. To satisfy spectators
• D. To measure spray distribution

Answer: (B)

Giving a warning before using OC spray is about signaling intent and aiming for de-escalation. By clearly informing the person that force is about to be used and that compliance is expected, the officer creates an opportunity for voluntary submission, which can stop the situation without a physical struggle. This reduces the risk of injury to the subject, the officer, and bystanders, and aligns with training that promotes using the minimum necessary force and attempting alternatives first.

While documenting the warning will appear in the report, the primary purpose of the warning is safety and de-escalation, not record-keeping. Satisfying spectators isn’t the goal and can undermine safety and policy. Measuring spray distribution isn’t accomplished by issuing a warning; distribution is assessed through other procedures and equipment checks, not through the warning itself.