When is a verbal warning typically required prior to OC deployment?

• A. When feasible and safe; if immediate danger exists, a warning may be omitted
• B. Always required regardless of danger
• C. Never required
• D. Only for suspects over 18

Answer: (A)

The main idea is that a verbal warning is used to de‑escalate and give the person a chance to comply before deploying OC, but it can be skipped when immediate danger requires a rapid response. When it’s feasible and safe to speak, issuing a warning supports de‑escalation and can prevent unnecessary force. However, if there is imminent threat to the officer or others, delaying for a warning could create greater harm, so the warning may be omitted in those cases. This reflects a balance between giving the subject a chance to comply and prioritizing safety.

The other options don’t fit typical practice: warnings aren’t always required regardless of danger, never required, or limited to suspects over a certain age.